The Visual Personification of John Watson in Film and Media and the Lack of Understanding of his Character

Session Title

Humanities: Emotions of Humanity within Literature

College

College of Arts and Sciences

Department

English

Faculty Mentor

Jo Koster, Ph.D.

Abstract

John Watson, a character created by Arthur Conan Doyle, is Sherlock Holmes’ best friend, partner in solving crimes, a doctor, and a scholar. Although, Watson is an educated and trained professional; he is also greatly underestimated in film and television adaptations. Why does this happen? Throughout my essay I explore the various reasons as to why John Watson unfortunately does not receive the credit he rightfully deserves. John Watson has, often times, been reduced to a side-kick character and assistant to Sherlock Holmes. Interpretations that reduce Watson to a sidekick and assistant that I explore throughout my essay are Dr. David Q Dawson in The Great Mouse Detective and Nigel Bruce’s interpretation in The Hound of Baskervilles. Additionally, I also explore the interpretations that depict close interpretations of Watson. These interpretations of Watson illustrate a Watson who has combat skills, medical training, and even deductive skills that the great Sherlock Holmes respects. The interpretations I argue that depict a well-rounded, educated, and professional Watson are David Burke’s in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Martin Freeman in BBC’s Sherlock. Not only do these interpretations closely illustrate Doyle’s Watson on-screen but they bring justice to John Watson and his name.

Course Assignment

ENGL 310 - Koster

Type of Presentation

Oral presentation

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

The Visual Personification of John Watson in Film and Media and the Lack of Understanding of his Character

John Watson, a character created by Arthur Conan Doyle, is Sherlock Holmes’ best friend, partner in solving crimes, a doctor, and a scholar. Although, Watson is an educated and trained professional; he is also greatly underestimated in film and television adaptations. Why does this happen? Throughout my essay I explore the various reasons as to why John Watson unfortunately does not receive the credit he rightfully deserves. John Watson has, often times, been reduced to a side-kick character and assistant to Sherlock Holmes. Interpretations that reduce Watson to a sidekick and assistant that I explore throughout my essay are Dr. David Q Dawson in The Great Mouse Detective and Nigel Bruce’s interpretation in The Hound of Baskervilles. Additionally, I also explore the interpretations that depict close interpretations of Watson. These interpretations of Watson illustrate a Watson who has combat skills, medical training, and even deductive skills that the great Sherlock Holmes respects. The interpretations I argue that depict a well-rounded, educated, and professional Watson are David Burke’s in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Martin Freeman in BBC’s Sherlock. Not only do these interpretations closely illustrate Doyle’s Watson on-screen but they bring justice to John Watson and his name.