Blood Libel and Accusation: A Study of Anti-Semitic Rhetoric in Medieval Europe
Poster Number
067
College
College of Arts and Sciences
Department
History
Faculty Mentor
Gregory Bell, Ph.D.
Abstract
Blood libel accusations were a series of evolving anti-Semitic ideas that held Jews would “sacrifice” or murder Christian children during their Purim or Passover festivities, further solidifying the idea of Jews as enemies of Christianity. Scholars have primarily focused on the effects of Jewish ritual murder accusations, also known as blood libel, but have failed to truly explore the rhetoric behind them. These accusations often changed with time; from simply being host profanation to outright child murder. This gruesome evolution seemingly coincided with the changing needs of the accusers themselves. Without knowing the motivations behind the accusations, it is difficult to accurately understand their effects on the Jewish community, or the wholesale social effects in Medieval Europe. The rhetoric used to spread the blood libel charges or to refute them provides a more complete understanding of what issues dominated the minds of Europeans during the Middle Ages. Examining medieval rhetoric regarding blood libel accusations shows they were given a religious façade to hide the fact that they were economically, socio-politically, or personally motivated. An analysis of documents such as papal bulls, royal decrees, clerical accounts of blood libel instances, and contemporary fictional media suggest that blood libel accusations were rarely, if ever, religiously motivated.
Course Assignment
HIST 590 – Bell
Previously Presented/Performed?
Fourth Annual Showcase of Undergraduate Research and Creative Endeavors (SOURCE), Winthrop University, April 2018
Start Date
20-4-2018 2:15 PM
End Date
20-4-2018 4:15 PM
Blood Libel and Accusation: A Study of Anti-Semitic Rhetoric in Medieval Europe
Richardson Ballroom (DIGS)
Blood libel accusations were a series of evolving anti-Semitic ideas that held Jews would “sacrifice” or murder Christian children during their Purim or Passover festivities, further solidifying the idea of Jews as enemies of Christianity. Scholars have primarily focused on the effects of Jewish ritual murder accusations, also known as blood libel, but have failed to truly explore the rhetoric behind them. These accusations often changed with time; from simply being host profanation to outright child murder. This gruesome evolution seemingly coincided with the changing needs of the accusers themselves. Without knowing the motivations behind the accusations, it is difficult to accurately understand their effects on the Jewish community, or the wholesale social effects in Medieval Europe. The rhetoric used to spread the blood libel charges or to refute them provides a more complete understanding of what issues dominated the minds of Europeans during the Middle Ages. Examining medieval rhetoric regarding blood libel accusations shows they were given a religious façade to hide the fact that they were economically, socio-politically, or personally motivated. An analysis of documents such as papal bulls, royal decrees, clerical accounts of blood libel instances, and contemporary fictional media suggest that blood libel accusations were rarely, if ever, religiously motivated.
